Be a tenant and investment hero with these Empire State Building retrofit tips

Heard at ULI Fall 2009 session: “Green Retrofits: What is making this the wave of the future?”

I went in to this session thinking that I’d already heard all there was to know on the well-publicized Empire State Building (ESB) retrofit. I’m pleased to report that my assumption turned out to be wrong … this session was a thriller; a high-protein download with lots of how-to’s that practitioners can use to be a tenant hero and  improve value with a comprehensive energy efficiency retrofit strategy. A thorough reporting of all the great tips would be too long for this post, but I think you’ll be able to put these highlights to good use:

The Set-up: A Great Business Case

Anthony Malkin, of Malkin Holdings spoke on behalf of the ESB ownership. The other speakers were representatives of New York City, the Rocky Mountain Institute and Johnson Controls.

The Empire State Building was already going through a $550 million repositioning, managed by Jones Lang LaSalle, before the ownership began to consider an energy efficiency retrofit. Since capital was already available for retrofit, no outside financing was needed to pay for the retrofit investment.

The team reported that the retrofit added nearly $13 million in upfront costs, with calculated savings worth $4 million per annum, so, the overall retrofit metrics are great, with the team reporting strong economics:

• Building annual energy costs were $11 million p.a., or 88 kBtu/sf/yr.
• 38% annual reduction in energy usage is projected; almost double the industry average.
• 3.1 year payback vs average 10-20 years.

Top Energy Tip: Reduce Load and Use

The evaluation of an aging chiller showed that the retrofit team can’t only focus on ‘easy’ measures such as changing light bulbs to achieve energy savings. The better business case comes from investing opportunities to reduce the building’s energy load, in addition to use. In the case of the ESB,  $40mm was slated for new chillers in a cooling plant, but load reduction measures elsewhere eliminated need for new chillers (!)  Result: Existing chillers were retrofitted for $5mm.

Tenant Relations Hat-trick

Investment real estate is only as valuable as the bundle of leases that generate rental income. So, many owners are motivated to green and/or retrofit their buildings when they know that it will help them to keep existing and/or attract new tenants. The trick is to get tenants on board with doing their share to keep energy costs down. When discussing retrofit costs/benefits with tenants, the ESB team focuses on the three drivers of tenant occupancy costs: payroll, utilities and rent.

In the case of the ESB, tenant buy-in on retrofit measures was crucial, since analysis revealed that more than half of the energy conservation measures would take place in the tenant’s space.  The team discussed three interconnected programs they use to assist tenants with reducing energy within their suites. The bonus they discovered is that word of these programs has attracted the attention of brokers and prospective tenants that typically would not include the ESB within their search for new space, so now the building has become competitive with a larger universe of possible tenants than prior to the retrofit.

Here are the three key tenant-related programs:

1. Pre-built space: Vacant suites were pre-fitted to turn-key status for prospective tenants, containing many features which would aid tenants with maintaining energy reduction upon move-in.
2. Tenant design guidelines: For tenants that build out their own suites, the landlord’s design guidelines incorporate energy efficiency measures
3. Tenant energy management program:  The ESB team developed a special energy management guide to help tenants understand how they use energy; they also give the tenants reports about their energy usage within their space, telling them how their energy use compares with the building average.

*   *   *

$1 billion in retrofit financing from Community Preservation Corporation

People always ask ‘where’s the beef’? when it comes to green finance.

Of course, they’re asking who’s making money available to develop or retrofit buildings to sustainable standards.

You should pay attention to the recent announcement from the Community Preservation Corporation (CPC), to bring $1 billion in energy efficiency retrofit financing to multifamily property owners in New York. This should provide a great energy efficiency financing model for others to duplicate.

The newly formed CPC Green Initiative aims to be an industry pacesetter by proving that seemingly disparate public and private entities can foster new and creative green finance solutions. According to Michael Lappin, CPC President:

“We anticipate financing retrofits for up to 15,000 apartments over the next few years. But to change the urban landscape we will also need to adjust the financing landscape.”

This program is notable because it includes participation by the great range of potential sustainable finance partners — an affordable housing lender, a GSE, pension funds, private lenders and utility companies.

Key financing components:

• $150MM in construction funds will be provided by the New York Building Revolving Fund for properties needing extensive renovation. That fund is backed by proceeds from Deutsche Bank, HSBC and other lenders.
• $300MM will come from New York pension funds.
• Freddie Mac will fund permanent loans for buildings not requiring the above construction loans.
• Freddie Mac has also committed to buy $500 million of loans from this program.

By directly incorporating efficiency retrofits into the loan process as well as requiring ongoing monitoring regimes through the loan life-cycle, we feel the CPC and its funding partners are taking the long-term holistic perspective that we believe is essential.

With a sizable partners including Freddie Mac, Deutsche Bank and the NY State Pension Fund, the CPC will need to fill a role that we find essential – being a strategic hub were investors and key stakeholders can find expertise and guidance.

This kind of pooled investment and lending commitment that relies on multiple layers of funding solutions is one that we are seeing on current projects. We think these kinds of well-designed and sufficiently capitalized partnerships will compliment local government funding.

We’re sure that we’ll see more structures like the CPC Green Initiative emerging on the market. Let us know if you are aware of any similar programs for commercial properties in your area.

*   *   *

Get plugged in:

• Do you like this post? We’d love to hear your comments and suggestions.
• You can contact us to discuss or initiate a project here.
• You can get Our Green Journey by email or via RSS.
• Sometimes you can see what we’re doing on Twitter.
• Photo credit: sx70/DUMBO-Brooklyn.

Will green finance ultimately be local?

What’s the best way to concentrate our money to fight climate change? At the national level? More subsidies for clean industries or incentives for individuals?

Today’s Green Inc blog post examines the idea that cities are the most likely agents for positive action against climate change, since the authors see “uncertain prospects for a global treaty in Copenhagen”, which means “that local communities will need to lead the way on climate change.”

The column’s authors pose the  idea that, “like politics, action on climate change is ultimately local”.

It is estimated that cities contribute somewhere between 30 and 41 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The estimate has a large range because no one is really certain of how to measure this particular statistic. Nevertheless, GHG emissions at even the lower end of that range makes cities key actors in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Nearly two years ago, we posted that cities would lead most positive progress on green building and climate change.

[Local governments] have become sustainability’s cowboys, driving their own resource, energy and climate change policies, since the federal government can not deliver a comprehensive enough solution that preserves their viability. Since real estate has been outed as the big consumer of city resources and energy services and the big contributor to regional carbon output, it is fair to say that investors will have to think about investment markets in terms of resource and energy sustainability in addition to classic real estate fundamentals so that they can remain relevant to their municipal partners.

As of this date, about 1,000 U.S. local governments have signed commitments reduce greenhouse gas emissions within their jurisdictions.

What could this mean for green finance? A lot, we believe.

We have just seen local governments flexing their muscle with a major share of U.S. stimulus funding going for local government initiatives for green buildings, energy efficiency retrofits, home weatherization and green jobs. Tax lien financing, a local government finance innovation, which is growing rapidly here in California, is catching on nationwide.

With banks still navigating a tough economy and not offering the kinds of products and amount of capital needed, there seems to be both need and opportunity for local governments to become primary suppliers and coordinators of the finance for sustainability.

If you agree with the Green Inc’s columnists’ analysis of the global climate change situation, they really don’t have much choice.

*   *   *

Get plugged in:

• Do you like this post? We’d love to hear your comments and suggestions.
• You can contact us to discuss or initiate a project here.
• You can get Our Green Journey by email or via RSS.
• Sometimes you can see what we’re doing on Twitter.
• Photo credit: istockphoto/Daniel Schoenen - Solar Building.

Lisa Michelle Galley profiled as a “First Lady of Sustainability”

Yours truly has been featured along with fourteen other women in Sustainable Industries March ‘09 issue, within their profiles of the “First Ladies of Sustainability”.

Sustainable Industries sets the stage for the profiles as follows:

The sustainable business community, like any industry group, is a sum of its parts. Gender aside, the leaders in the space have spent years trying to convince stakeholders of the vast importance of adhering to triple-bottom-line economics.

Creating a shift in the way business is done and how success is measured takes an unconventional approach. Many of the women leaders that Sustainable Industries spoke with for this article attributed their success to their willingness to take chances and blaze uncharted territory.

Whether analyzing the financial risks of green building projects or assessing the marketability of a cleantech startup, creating the tools to help companies increase their energy efficiency or crafting the framework for a sustainable business curriculum, these women have laid the groundwork for systems that will be used for years to come.

For my part, its a great honor to be rubbing shoulders with some of sustainability’s Jedi Masters: Andrea Traber, Karla Bell, and Lynn Simon,  all of whom are deep experts on driving market transformation — and on a large scale.

Andrea is president of the Board of our US Green Building Council Northern California Chapter and director with international juggernaut KEMA.  Karla is advancing carbon reducing technologies on a global scale.  Lynn literally helped found the US Green Building Council.

One of the things that I learned early in my career is that when you are looking for a job, go and search for a boss you like.  Later, I figured out that if you are looking to make a difference in the world — go and find a teacher.

I’ve been quite fortunate to be in a business community with so many women like these who fearlessly advocate for community, country and planet, are respected experts in their disciplines and generously share what they know.

You can read the full article profiling all of the “First Ladies of Sustainability” here.

Green Roof Incentive in New York

Photocredit: dreamymo
Folks love the green incentives that have immediate, easily calculated cash value.

Environmental Leader (a green newsletter we dig) has put out the word on New York’s new green roof tax credit of $4.50/sf, up to $100,000 for installing a green roof. It’s structured as a one year credit off property taxes.

It comes out to an approximate 25% reduction off the cost of the roof — a significant value. I checked around with a couple of sources who said that this is a “decent estimate” of the savings. Which we took to mean that you need to factor in variability in the roof pricing — and hence, the credit’s actual value.

Not bad — a green roof in New York for 75% of the price. And that’s not including the heating and cooling benefits the roof brings to the building as well as the reduction of the heat island effect in the city.

Go Big Apple!

Next Page »