Use these metrics to measure your portfolio’s triple bottom line performance

Get this new research on metrics that helps you measure property triple bottom line performance.

We are pleased to share a new report titled, Metrics for Responsible Property Investing: Developing and Maintaining a High-Performance Portfolio.

You can download the report here.

This research was co-authored by Jean Rogers of Arup, David Wood of the Responsible Property Investing Center and myself. This is a working draft for comment that was presented today (4 November 2009) to a joint session of ULI’s Responsible Property Investing and Sustainable Development Councils.

Why do we need metrics for triple bottom line investing?

Our survey of the industry indicated that the spread of triple bottom line investing was being hampered by the fact that most currently available real estate sustainability reporting came from investors who would green a couple of showcase buildings in their portfolios.  This lack of transparency leaves the broader real estate industry and capital markets with several pressing problems:

• They cannot determine if sustainability performance on the portfolio is improving over time.
• They do not know how the portfolio’s green performance compares with the portfolio’s of other investors.
• There is no way to judge sustainability risks hidden within any portfolio.

Drafting and road-testing proposed metrics with the Bay Area Council and TIAA-CREF

After developing a set of metrics that would represent the ten RPI principles in action, we worked with the Bay Area Council Family of Funds and TIAA-CREF to road test them, to obtain real world feedback from actual investor users.

Bay Area Council Family of Funds tested the metrics on recent acquisitions to see how the metrics might be useful during the property acquisition process.

TIAA-CREF tested the metrics on a portfolio of properties they own, to determine how the metrics could possibly assist them with asset management activities.

Both investors were also at today’s ULI session and provided in depth comments on the use of the metrics and their recommendations.

Key takeaways

Here are a few of our findings based upon investor feedback about their use of the metrics:

• RPI metrics do provide a tangible link to asset and portfolio value by pointing to possible decreases in operating expenses and/or increases in rental revenue.
• The use of RPI metrics can assist with opportunity finding: a key objective of due diligence during  acquisition.
• The use of RPI metrics can help drive social responsibility within the portfolio, instead of just monitoring it after the fact.

We need your help!

This report is currently a working draft for comment. It was submitted to members of the Sustainable Development and Responsible Property Investing Councils for their review and comment. We would also appreciate hearing the comments and questions of real estate investors and practitioners within the Green Journey community.

Let us know your thoughts about these proposed metrics. Also feel free to forward this report to anyone in your network whose practice might benefit from the information.

We look forward to hearing from you and will keep you updated on this effort as it evolves.

You can download the report here.

Related reading:

• We’ve covered the emergence of responsible property investing many times before.
• You can also view a short presentation on the basics of responsible property investing here.

*   *   *

Pension Funds Green Agendas Continue — You Prepared?

Are you on top of your institutional investors’ green agenda?

Today’s post focuses on a “state of SRI” article sent over by Green Journey reader and blogger, Ari Frankel.

It hints rather loudly to American real estate investors and developers that they need to step up their green investment and development programs — or else find themselves less competitive with funding from the ‘Big Money’ institutional investors.

Seems that an increasing number of pension funds worldwide are pushing for a more explicit environmental agenda within their investment holdings, according to the New York Times earlier this week. Nothing new there, for the deep green crowd, but great to know, in any event.  And the Times gets kudos for being GPC — geopolitically correct — by citing the leadership of several European and one American pension fund in green investing (such factoids hammer at the “reinvent the green wheel” bias we have here in the US).  It points to the United Nation’s Principle’s of Responsible Investment (to which we are a happy signatory) as now representing 381 members and $14 trillion in assets.

The Times also asks the necessary question of whether Big Money is really creating positive environmental and social change. For example, they point out that no one really knows if the pension funds’ efforts are really creating the impact they profess to seek.  Or if all of the funds with a green agenda as committed as they claim (gasp!) .

HOWEVER, it was pretty surprising that the usually sharp, pro-SRI NY Times failed to dedicate one pixel of ink to the corporate watchdogs like CERES or BSR — THE acknowledged leaders in pushing corporations and institutional investors to adopt ESG (environmental, social, governance) principles within their business and investing activities.  CERES has an extensive list of tools and publications documenting their efforts to educate the investment community on the value a green agenda brings.  And you can take a lookat our previous coverage of CERES’ video on their engagement work as well.

Nonetheless, good takeaways and a not-so-subtle warning are there between the lines for commercial real estate. The point? Simply, most of these Big Money investors have some amount of their funds allocated to real estate. If they haven’t tailored their real estate investment criteria towards green real estate, yet, then they are bound to do it soon.

Sooner or later,  you are going to call on your pension fund investors for your normal performance meetings and, in addition to the regular good dialogue, you are going to be handed more requests –  possibly in the form of more compliance reporting, audit checklists, risk assessments, engagement meetings, what have you.

Will you be ready?