New BEPA Standard, Case Study Download↓ and Webinars for Measuring Building Energy Efficiency

 

• Date/Time: March 29th 1:00 PM EST - 2:30 PM EST
• Title: Understanding the New ASTM BEPA Standard E 2797-11
• Speaker: Anthony Buonicore, Chairman of the ASTM BEPA Task Group

What will change everything in 2011 and beyond?

 

A few 2010 events either changed or reinforced perceptions enough to influence sustainable finance in 2011 and beyond:

1. Positive Green Building Momentum & Performance

Confirming year-end data reinforces the value of building environmental certification.

• LEED-certified buildings have reached a footprint of 1 billion square feet worldwide, with another six billion square feet of registered projects in the pipeline.

• In the The Economics of Green Building, researchers demonstrate that green building economic performance was not affected by recent market volatility, that the economic premiums in the green properties studies remain substantial and energy efficiency does contribute to higher rents and values.

2. Quantified Credit Risk for Environmental Irresponsibility

• If your lender shrugs when you tell them that building environmental certification benefits them, too, send them a copy of Corporate Environmental Management & Credit Risk. Rob Bauer and Daniel Hann’s prize-winning study that demonstrated how US companies engaged in environmentally risky activities paid a premium for their bond debt of up to 64 bps per annum.

3. Innovative Structure Straddles Real Estate & Energy

• We covered Hunt Power’s use of the REIT structure to offer up to $2.1 billion in energy infrastructure finance via joint ventures, purchase and leasing. There are several energy and technology sectors that urgently need better ways to access capital than the market can provide. Look out for more novel, hybrid investment structures that bring commercial solutions to financing sustainability across buildings and other domains.

4. Regulatory Ramp Up Continues

• Carbon cap and trade has arrived in California, joining building energy disclosure requirements and Cal Green. Under new regulations adopted 20 December, greenhouse gas emissions of large industrial plants will be capped from 2012 forward. Given California’s legal requirement to reduce emissions by 15% from today’s levels by 2020, we will continue to see heavy action both within California, as well as California’s experience influencing how these issues are handled in other states and even within the Federal Government.

5. PACE: New Tools Equal New Perceptions

• We dedicated substantial coverage last year to tax-lien financing for energy efficiency. Professionals from diverse sectors joined forces to cheer on property-assessed clean energy’s brave fight…and boo the regulators as they killed most residential programs. New tools equal new perceptions. PACE’s major success has been how it helped build awareness and shape positive perceptions. Now practitioners realize that such structures are possible and urgently needed. That’s kicked off a lot more interest in getting green finance right from now on.  Policy makers are working on various versions of PACE 2.0 or other PACE-like enabling legislation. It’s hard to tell what progress they’ll make, but PACE’s potential helped focus commercial real estate and government on the market need for such structures in a way not seen before.

So, what kind of market do you think you’ll sell into?

With so much momentum already underway, what are the prospects for your building portfolio?  We think successful investors in the coming years will be good at continuously re-imagining and reinventing their businesses, often at highly local levels.

Which of these events carry the most weight for green real estate?

What’s missing from the green finance conversation that you think needs attention?

Photo credit: Muse by Oimax. If you are a fan of urban photography, check out Oimax’s 6,000+ photostream of stunning Tokyo architecture, scenes and objects.

The first real estate and energy investment mashup is here!

 

The media and web worlds gave us the term ‘mashup’ to describe the combining of different files, songs and other applications into a new piece of work. Now that definition can be extended to a new domain entirely — real estate and energy investing.

Hunt Power has joined forces with TIAA-CREF, John Hancock Insurance and others to create two energy infrastructure companies that are structured as real estate investment trusts.  Initial estimates are that the companies are set to  invest up to $2.1 billion.

Yes, that’s right — electric and gas infrastructure REITS!

The new REITS will provide capital to municipalities, co-ops, utilities and others needing to install electricity and gas infrastructure.  Their initial footprint focuses on Texas, the Great Plains and the desert Southwest regions. In comments to GlobeSt. com, Hunt’s CEO explained how the companies will operate similarly to hospitality REITS:

“they’ll  develop and/or own assets and lease them to regional operators. In some cases, the REITs will acquire distribution and transmission assets from operators, who will then lease back the assets.”

The arrival of these energy infrastructure REITs caught our attention because we’ve been digging into the climate change investment reports being circulated by Goldman Sach’s (GS) and others. We are starting to see early signals of the capital markets trying to assign risk and value based upon a company’s presence in a high-emissions or low-emissions sector.

We are tracking these developments, since our commercial building landlord and lender clients will have to understand whether it makes sense and if so, how to incorporate tenant emissions exposure within their underwriting of major commercial leases.

If you’ve been following that particular strand, then you’ll be able to stay with my ’roundabout’ chain of explanations, which will tie into the significant market opportunity for firms such as the new energy infrastructure REITS.

In a 2009 report titled , “Change is Coming: A framework for climate change - a defining issue for the 21st century”, GS laid out their analysis of how competitive dynamics in several market sectors could change significantly, along the lines of those sectors’ higher or lower emissions exposure.

In a scenario assigning a US$60/t carbon price, they estimate that 15% of the total cash flows generated within the sectors might be transferred from less carbon efficient to more carbon efficient sectors.

90% of those outgoing cash flows transferred would come from the most carbon intensive industries, which includes electric and non-electric utilities. You can click on the graphic below from their report to see their breakdown of the estimated cash flows that could be lost by the utilities and a few other industries, due to emissions costs.

While there is no information available on how Hunt Power evaluates carbon emissions opportunity within its business model, and I’m not suggesting that you should buy into GS’ carbon pricing specifically, but if their  market views are even halfway true, there’s a ripe market for creative investment vehicles like these new infrastructure REITs, since their conventional utility sector brethren will not be in any position to deliver the kind of capital investment needed for the energy infrastructure so badly needed throughout the US.

The REITs arrival on the market also opens up the field of direct green finance and investments to more creative investment mashups that span multiple industries, but I will have to cover that in a future post. For now, we’ll be tracking Hunt’s developments with great interest as we are sure that more investors will be paying !

Vet your metrics, avoid wrong investment decisions with these Expert Questions

 

Metrics are important to green building finance because they can help you prove the green value-add you’re getting from your sustainability or energy efficiency initiatives.  First of all, they’ll drive the project choices that your company makes, which will determine the future state of the green finance or investment program that you’re running. Over time, they’ll teach your company how and where to improve its green investing activities because they’ll point you to the areas to improve in order to reach your business objectives.

There’s a lot riding on your choice of metrics

However, achieving that success depends on choosing the right metrics in the first place. There’s lots of evidence that getting metrics wrong can result in huge problems… once you realize that there’s even a problem in the first place and that it stems from a faulty metric.

Enterprise Group CEO John Mariotti wrote about how the medical establishment continues to accept the “normal” human body temperature of 98.6 F, even it was proven to be 98.25 F many years ago.

There’s also the expensive (and ongoing) example of the losses suffered by governments and investors that relied on the AAA credit ratings on securitized mortgage pools, which touched off a global financial crisis, when the ratings were exposed as inaccurate.

Expert Questions for vetting metrics

We help clients to vet their metrics, so that they make the right decisions about their target environmental, social and economic impacts. I condensed them into shortlist of Expert Questions for Vetting Metrics**, that I taught my grad finance class yesterday. You can use it to locate and assess potential weaknesses in measurements, preventing wrong decisions and expensive problems.

1. Who created the metric or it’s criteria?
2. How do they define value?
3. What do they want to know?
4. What will they do with the data?
5. Does the measurement and any impacts comply with the Four C’s?
6. Are chosen discount rates and sensitivity scenarios well-justified?
7. How does it drive marginal improvement in environmental quality and well-being?
8. What’s the measurement baseline?
9. How is the metric’s range of motion defined?
10. Does the metrics reporting period match the firm’s normal financial reporting period?

There’s only enough time for now to discuss a simple principle that is behind #’s 1-4. It is: forms of social / environmental measurement serve the perspective and objectives of the measurement’s creator.

Most practitioners know that it’s important to use metrics that are comparable across many firms, to get a transparent view and the right context about a company’s or portfolio’s performance.  In green investing, there are various private data collection firms compiling this information, but they may focus their data reporting on a particular sub-sector of clients. The measurements used can be less effective for you if your firm does not fit the profile of this client sub-sector.

I’ll write more on the other vetting questions from time to time, but feel free to use this list to check or recheck your own metrics or the criteria that’s behind them. When you know you’re accurately measuring green investment performance, then you’ll enjoy the benefits of better decision making and impact.

**What are Expert Questions?

Troubleshooting multifamily energy efficiency finance

 

Yesterday I spoke on a panel put together by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) at a  workshop investigating the barriers to and simplifiers needed for energy efficiency financing for the market rate multifamily sector.

Get mind map and video notes

Play the video to run through the highlights in ~7 minutes or download this interactive mind map to read the detailed notes at your own pace.

Synopsis - Every energy efficiency financing decision requires knowing the green building business case

Throughout the session, we drilled down into landlords and lenders problems with energy efficiency financing. It wasn’t hard to name quite a few.

The CPUC can address these issues once they understand their relative impacts on which parties. To find that out, they have to delve into the green building business case for the market rate apartment sector. That’s something that they’ve only recently focused on.

First of all, energy savings were discussed in isolation from other retrofit benefits — similar to what I observed at yesterday’s commercial building workshop, too much silo thinking.

Retrofitting apartments can translate into higher net operating income and cash flow in a variety of ways. In addition to energy savings, more durable systems last longer, need less maintenance and decrease the amount of funds going to capital expenditures over the lifetime of ownership. On top of that, effective gross income can be improved through tenant retention.

Product design received long overdue attention.  My co-panelists echoed gripes by yesterday’s commercial building panelists about the need for simplified transaction processes and lower costs.

Understanding the landlord’s needs and requirements as a customer (and not a “ratepayer”) will help the regulators to bring financial products to market that can help property owners become more proactive about initiating deeper retrofits.

The notes and video contain more details on the topics covered. It was clear that any future products would be greatly helped by understanding the total value-creation picture (yes, systems thinking again). The green building business case helps them to quantify that and make the connection between the goals of owners and lenders as well as their own.

Tell me what you think

What green or energy efficiency finance programs are you watching these days? How well are they working in your market?  Please share your comments.

« Previous Page — Next Page »